Western Pacific's "Feather River Canyon" in N scale

[Powersteamguy1790]

Fantastic Bridge work Rodney.  Very well done.

Stay cool and run steam......

[R Edington]

   

Fantastic Bridge work Rodney. 
Stay cool and run steam......

Thanks Bob and I'll have some pics of some steam soon.

[Powersteamguy1790]

   

Fantastic Bridge work Rodney. 
Stay cool and run steam......

Thanks Bob and I'll have some pics of some steam soon.

Looking forward to it Rodney.

Stay cool and run steam.......

[ACL1504]

Rodney,

This is just wonderful. The Feather River Canyon scene is awesome. And in N scale no less. Fantastic stuff.

Tom

[jbvb]

I'm impressed too.  The 24" minimum radius will look good with the big steam and diesel lashups and you're leaving plenty of room for scenery.

[R Edington]

Rodney,

This is just wonderful. The Feather River Canyon scene is awesome. And in N scale no less. Fantastic stuff.

Tom

Thanks Tom
One of the reasons I've stayed with n scale, is the scenery to track ratio that is possible. 

[R Edington]

I'm impressed too.  The 24" minimum radius will look good with the big steam and diesel lashups and you're leaving plenty of room for scenery.

Thanks James
The big steam do look awesome going through the curves and the passenger trains really look at home as well.

[R Edington]

     Keddie





















   On the right is westbound bigboy 4023 with a block of refers headed for Orovile and the other is a general freight pulled by a challenger that just came off the high line going to Portola.

[R Edington]

OK I have a question for those of you that are reading this.

  Do you like each post to have a lot of photos or would rather see just 1 or 2 photos per post???


I know that the longer posts makes each pager longer and just wanted to get some opinions on what make it best for you.

[ak-milw]

Either way for me Rodney, I just like looking!

[S&S RR]

OK I have a question for those of you that are reading this.

  Do you like each post to have a lot of photos or would rather see just 1 or 2 photos per post???


I know that the longer posts makes each pager longer and just wanted to get some opinions on what make it best for you.

Rodney


I think your doing a great job with the thread. I like having 2-4 pictures per post because of the way the pages end up being formatted. It's your thread and your layout looks wonderful.

[ACL1504]

Rodney,

When I add to my thread I usually only show two pictures, three at the most.  I got in the habit of doing this several years ago. On the old forum we could show 6+ pictures with each post. Many times the server would "glitch" and I'd lose the photos and narrative I was typing. This caused me to have to start over on that particular post.

So now, I only do a little narrative and a couple of photos out of habit.

As all the others have written, your thread and your choice. My two cents worth.

Tom

[Janbouli]

Either way works for me .

[R Edington]

  Thanks for all the input.

[R Edington]

 Keddie to Williams Loop







  I put Quincy Junction at the east end if the Keddie yard, but on the prototype, it was a few miles east of Keddie.

Quincy RR is the line on the right. It was originally just going to have a return loop below Williams Loop but I figured out a way to add the town of Quincy above where my work desk is. 

 
All the prints will go into the lounge room when I get the walls done in there.